The Contrary Investing Report
Investing and Trading News, with a Contrarian, Sarcastic Twist!


More John Hussman on Why the S&P 500 is 50% Overvalued (With Cool Charts & Ratios)

by Brett on July 21, 2010

Last week we reported that acclaimed fund manager John Hussman wrote that he believed the S&P overvalued by 40%.

In his latest newsletter, Hussman revisits the fundamental valuation of US equities – with a couple of interesting ratios and charts as well.  Hussman writes:

I can’t emphasize enough that when you hear an analyst say “stocks are cheap based on forward operating earnings” it would be best to replace that phrase in your head with “stocks are cheap based on Wall Street’s extrapolative estimates of a misleading number.”

More sober and historically reliable measures of market valuation create a much more challenging picture. Apart from our own measures, which indicate continued overvaluation, there are several good indicators of market valuation that are not overly sensitive to year-to-year fluctuations in profit margins. One is based on the 10-year average of actual net (not operating) earnings, which is advocated by economist Robert Shiller, and another is Tobin’s “q” ratio which is based on comparing market value to replacement cost, and is advocated by Andrew Smithers. Both of these measures largely agree with our own measures, both presently and on a historical basis. Based on last week’s valuations, both suggest that the S&P 500 is substantially overvalued.

To illustrate this chart, he includes this chart, which outlines the two ratios since 1900.  The chart speaks for itself – you should buy stocks when they are below the line, and sell them when above:

http://www.smithers.co.uk/images/150610105639.JPG

US Stock Market Value according to q and CAPE

Source: Hussman Funds

You can read Hussman’s full piece here.

With stocks significantly above the median line here, you’d want to be a seller, not a buyer, at these prices.  I maintain our stance that we probably have another 5-6 years of bear market left to get stocks down to a reasonable bear market bottom valuation.  According to the chart above, stock are more fairly priced than they were in 1999…but not yet even close to typical valuations at secular bear market bottoms.

Hat tip to Jonathan Lederer!


Our Partners





Further Reading:

We publish a free daily newsletter, The Contrary Investing Report, which highlights trading and investing stories that are key to your financial success and survival. Please subscribe here.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

More on this topic (What's this?)
S&P 500 Chart – The Art of Technical Analysis
Why We May See a Rally in U.S. Stocks
Three Reasons Stocks Could Jump 18% in 2012
Read more on S&P 500 (SPX) at Wikinvest

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

dizzy7 August 5, 2010 at 7:35 am

So, according to you, no one should have bought US stocks except during the Depression/WW2, and the Oil Embargo Recession of the late 70’s-early 80’s, and during the 40 years or so between buying opportunities everyone should hoard cash under their mattress?

Brett August 5, 2010 at 2:30 pm

I think you should buy stocks when they are undervalued, and sell them when they are overvalued. Right now they are overvalued, at least in my opinion, hence I’m not buying, I’m selling.

I look forward to being able to buy stocks en masse in another 6-10 years, when the bear market eventually bottoms and they are much cheaper than they are today.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: